-
Mr. Greedy, an African Penguin With 230 Descendants, Dies at 33 - 15 mins ago
-
5 Rookies Who Will Stand Out in Week 1 of NFL Season - 28 mins ago
-
Harris Targets Trump on Abortion in Latest Campaign Ad - 59 mins ago
-
Denny Hamlin NASCAR Nightmare As Driver Hits Powertrain Issues During Qualifying - about 1 hour ago
-
Video of Kamala Harris Embracing Crying Woman Takes Off Online - 2 hours ago
-
Queens Is Abuzz Over Two Americans in the U.S. Open Finals - 2 hours ago
-
Utah Star QB Cam Rising Leaves Game Early With Apparent Injury - 2 hours ago
-
‘Room Next Door’ Claims Top Prize at Venice Film Festival - 2 hours ago
-
Largest Texas Newspaper Accuses Greg Abbott of ‘Beyond Reckless’ Behavior - 3 hours ago
-
Family of American Slain in the West Bank Demands an Independent Inquiry - 3 hours ago
Trump Offers Court a $100 Million Bond to Pause a $454 Million Judgment
Donald J. Trump offered a New York appeals court on Wednesday a bond of only $100 million to pause the more than $450 million penalty he faces in his civil fraud case, a clear sign that the former president lacks the money to cover the full amount.
Mr. Trump, who is on the clock to either secure a bond from a company or produce the full amount himself, also asked the appeals court to pause enforcement of the financial penalty and a wide range of other punishments the judge levied. They include a prohibition on obtaining a loan from a New York bank for three years and a ban on running a company in the state during that same period.
One appellate court judge was expected to hear the request from Mr. Trump on Wednesday afternoon and issue a decision shortly after. If the appellate judge grants the pause, it will be only temporary; Mr. Trump would still have to persuade a larger panel of appellate judges to keep the judgment on hold.
In seeking relief, Mr. Trump’s lawyers disclosed that they would be unable to secure a bond for the full amount, raising the prospect that he might soon default on the judgment if the appeals court denies his request.
“The exorbitant and punitive amount of the judgment coupled with an unlawful and unconstitutional blanket prohibition on lending transactions would make it impossible to secure and post a complete bond,” the lawyers wrote.
Posting bond for the full amount would prevent the New York attorney general’s office, which brought the fraud suit, from collecting the judgment until Mr. Trump’s appeal is resolved. The attorney general, Letitia James, built her case on the accusation that Mr. Trump had fraudulently inflated his net worth by as much as $2 billion.
Unless the appeals court accepts the $100 million bond or grants Mr. Trump additional time, the attorney general can collect at any moment. Under New York law, Ms. James, can seize Mr. Trump’s bank accounts and potentially take control of his New York properties.
Mr. Trump’s net worth, which he estimates in the billions, is largely derived from real estate, not cash. As of last year, he was sitting on more than $350 million in cash, as well as stocks and bonds he could sell in a hurry, according to a recent New York Times review of his financial records.
But the sum of the judgment in the civil fraud case and the $83.3 million judgment that Mr. Trump faces from a defamation trial involving the writer E. Jean Carroll far eclipses his stockpile of cash.
In its own filing, Ms. James’s office asked the appeals court to deny Mr. Trump’s request.
“There is no merit to defendants’ contention that a full bond or deposit is unnecessary because they are willing to post a partial undertaking of less than a quarter of the judgment amount,” the attorney general’s office wrote. “Defendants all but concede that Mr. Trump has insufficient liquid assets to satisfy the judgment.”
This is a developing story and will be updated.