-
Mets Sign Free Agent Pitcher Sean Manaea to $75 Million Contract: Reports - 23 mins ago
-
‘I Was Destroyed by It’: 4 Men on Abuse at Ireland’s Catholic Schools - 51 mins ago
-
Week 16 Sees Raiders Play Way Out Of Landing Top QB In NFL Draft - 58 mins ago
-
Former WWE Champion Addresses Potential Royal Rumble Return - 2 hours ago
-
Trump and Biden, Make the Hostages Your Priority - 2 hours ago
-
Costco Guys More Popular Than Roman Reigns, Says Former AEW Superstar - 2 hours ago
-
Organized Looting Throws Gaza Deeper Into Chaos - 2 hours ago
-
Today’s ‘Wordle’ #1,283 Answers, Hints and Clues for Monday, December 23 - 3 hours ago
-
Artists We Lost in 2024, in Their Words - 3 hours ago
-
John Cena vs Logan Paul ‘On The Table’ For WrestleMania 41: Report - 3 hours ago
Abortion, Marijuana, and Taxes: Key Ballot Issues in South Dakota
South Dakota voters will face pivotal decisions on measures affecting abortion rights, recreational marijuana, food taxes, and primary election structures.
With issues spanning social, economic, and political landscapes, the outcomes could mark a shift in the state’s policies and priorities.
South Dakota’s abortion rights amendment aims to introduce protections within the state constitution.
If passed, it would prohibit restrictions on abortion within the first 12 weeks of pregnancy and limit regulations from the 13th through the 26th week to those directly related to patient health. After the 26th week, abortions would be allowed only to preserve the patient’s life or health.
The measure would override the state’s current abortion ban, which has been in place since 2022 and criminalizes performing an abortion except to save a patient’s life.
While abortion rights advocates back the amendment as a way to restore personal freedoms, anti-abortion groups are mobilizing against it. A lawsuit by the Life Defense Fund, pending a court hearing in December, argues that alleged misconduct in gathering signatures should disqualify the measure from the ballot. Supporters of the measure see this legal challenge as a last-ditch attempt to defy voter intentions.
Marijuana Legalization
South Dakota voters are again considering legalizing recreational marijuana, a topic revisited frequently in recent years. This measure would allow adults aged 21 and older to possess up to two ounces of marijuana, excluding concentrated forms, and permit limited personal cultivation.
Despite voters approving medical marijuana in 2020 and an amendment legalizing recreational use, the state Supreme Court invalidated the recreational measure.
Another attempt failed in 2022. If successful, South Dakota would join 24 other states that have already legalized recreational cannabis. Proponents argue this could bring economic benefits, while opponents raise concerns over regulation and social impact.
Food Sales Tax
Another ballot measure could give grocery shoppers relief by removing the state sales tax on food. South Dakota lowered its general sales tax last year from 4.5 percent to 4.2 percent, and the new initiative would eliminate taxes on most food items, excluding alcohol and prepared meals.
State analysts project that this change could result in a $124 million annual revenue loss, or roughly 5 percent of the general budget. Proponents argue that reducing taxes on necessities will help residents facing high inflation, while critics worry about the financial affect on state-funded programs and services.
“Jungle” Primary System
A proposal to shift South Dakota’s primary election format to a “jungle primary” could redefine races. This initiative would allow all candidates, regardless of party affiliation, to run on a single primary ballot, with the top two vote-getters advancing to the general election.
Supporters believe the measure would allow independents and moderates a fairer shot and could better align election results with voter sentiment. However, both major parties oppose the initiative, contending it would harm smaller parties and might lead to an all-Republican ballot in a state where the GOP dominates.
As these diverse initiatives await a decision, the outcomes could signal significant changes in South Dakota’s legislative landscape.
This article includes reporting from The Associated Press
Source link