Longtime OC city council member admits to submitting false records
October 31, 2024
4,992
Rancho Santa Margarita Mayor Carol Gamble, a founding member of the city’s first council in 2000, will plead guilty to making a false affidavit on paperwork she filed to get on the ballot, according to Orange County Dist. Atty. Todd Spitzer.
Wednesday’s announcement comes a week after Fullerton City Council candidate Scott Markowitz agreed to a plea deal after being charged with falsifying nomination paperwork.
Carol A. Gamble, city of Rancho Santa Margarita mayor.
(City of Rancho Santa Margarita)
“American democracy relies on the absolute integrity of the electoral process,” Spitzer said in a statement. “Voters must have total confidence that every election is being carried out in a fair and unbiased manner.”
Gamble, who dropped out of the council race last week, was charged with a misdemeanor. Her plea allows her to avoid jail time with 160 hours of community service, one year of probation and an unknown amount of restitution based on the outcome of the election.
Spitzer said Gamble is expected to officially enter her plea in court on Friday.
Gamble has lived in Rancho Santa Margarita for over 30 years, according to her bio page, and was a member of the inaugural City Council in 2000. The second mayor in the city’s history, she served on council from 2000 to 2004 before starting her current tenure in 2011.
She has rotated into the mayor’s seat in 2001, 2014, 2017 and this year.
She was a no-show for the latest city council meeting on Oct. 23.
A call and email to Gamble’s office was not immediately returned.
Under penalty of perjury, Gamble signed nomination paperwork on Aug. 7 that stated she personally collected and witnessed 30 signatures. To run for office, a candidate needs a minimum of 20 signatures.
However, Rancho Santa Margarita residents led by Shawn Gordon, a former council candidate, sent a letter to Orange County Registrar Bob Page alerting him to potential fraud.
The TimesOC reviewed Gordon’s letter last week and a notarized complaint from a resident that stated, “Ms. Gamble was not present at that time and did not witness my signature.”
The letter was forwarded to Spitzer’s office, according to Gordon.
“I’m hoping Spitzer does the right thing,” he said last week. “This is absolutely cut and dry.”
Gamble released a statement on Oct. 20 that she “signed [her] nomination paperwork attesting to an inaccurate statement.”
She said then that she was “deeply embarrassed” and suspended her campaign.
Her name is still on the ballot, however, along with Keri Lynn Baert.
Gamble stated that she would resign immediately if she won. Since she didn’t file enough legal signatures, she is ineligible to run and can’t win.
Should she be the top vote-getter in her race, however, the city would likely hold a special election, according to Spitzer.
Gamble’s announcement follows that of Markowitz, who ran for Fullerton City Council and pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor for falsifying nomination paperwork.
Markowitz also submitted 30 signatures, claimed to have witnessed them all in person under the penalty of perjury, and was also turned in by residents who claimed he had not watched them sign.
The admission led to a dismissal of one felony count of perjury by declaration and one felony count of record of forged or false instrument.
Avoiding imprisonment, Markowitz was sentenced to 160 hours of community service and ordered to pay restitution.
Should he win, Markowitz would be ineligible to serve, according to Spitzer. The city would host a special election to fill his seat.
Um die besten Erfahrungen zu bieten, verwenden wir Technologien wie Cookies, um Geräteinformationen zu speichern und/oder darauf zuzugreifen. Wenn Sie diesen Technologien zustimmen, können wir Daten wie das Surfverhalten oder eindeutige IDs auf dieser Website verarbeiten. Die Nichteinwilligung oder der Widerruf der Einwilligung kann bestimmte Merkmale und Funktionen beeinträchtigen.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
