-
How to Watch Summer House: Live Stream Season 9 Premiere, TV Channel - 18 mins ago
-
Opinion | Chrystia Freeland on the U.S. Tariffs on Canadian Steel and Aluminum - 36 mins ago
-
‘Wordle’ Today #1,335 Hints and Answer for Thursday, February 13 Game - 53 mins ago
-
F.A.A. Facing Criticism After Three Deadly Plane Crashes - about 1 hour ago
-
‘Connections’ February 13: Hints and answers for puzzle #613 - about 1 hour ago
-
Eric Adams Dodges Second Legal Action From Trump DOJ - 2 hours ago
-
State Dept. to Designate Latin American Cartels as Terrorist Groups - 2 hours ago
-
UCLA suspends Students for Justice in Palestine after protest at UC regent’s home - 2 hours ago
-
Los Angeles Evacuation Warnings Issued as Risk of Mudslides Looms - 3 hours ago
-
David Edward Byrd, Whose Posters Captured Rock’s Energy, Dies at 83 - 3 hours ago
Opinion | Musk? Trump? Who Exactly Is Running the Federal Government?
Mr. Musk’s recent stand against U.S.A.I.D., the federal agency responsible for administering foreign and development assistance since 1961, could have come directly from the state capture playbook — only often more brazen in intent. “U.S.A.I.D. is a criminal organization,” Mr. Musk posted over the weekend. “Time for it to die.” In that time, the agency’s website went offline, and its top two security officials were placed on administrative leave after refusing to allow members of Mr. Musk’s team access to secure U.S.A.I.D. systems. Finally, on Monday, Mr. Musk said that he had consulted Mr. Trump and that “we’re shutting it down.” (On Monday, Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, announced that he is the acting administrator of the agency.)
The example from South Africa was detailed in a 2016 report actually called “State of Capture” from the country’s public protector, Thulisile Madonsela.
It described how, over a number of years, billions of dollars of public funding went into the pockets of a few elites, instead of supporting struggling health services and education systems. Ms. Madonsela’s office had received a series of allegations that the Guptas, a wealthy Indian family with deep business ties in South Africa (the Guptas have denied wrongdoing), had successfully pressured the president and other top officials into removing or appointing ministers of state-owned entities, “resulting in improper and possibly corrupt award of state contracts and benefits to the Gupta family’s businesses.”
State capture is not a condition endemic to post-apartheid South Africa. The so-called Operation Car Wash investigation in Brazil, for example, revealed secret, illicit relationships on the scale of state capture.
So what’s to be done in countries that face the threat of state capture?
First, as in South Africa, conduct a high-profile investigation run by elements of the government not yet captured. Though the United States has no office of the public protector, several federal government watchdog agencies could flex their investigative powers. Mr. Trump already culled as many as 17 inspectors general, but other agencies, including the Congressional Research Service, Government Accountability Office or the Congressional Budget Office, could step up.
Source link