-
Athol Fugard, South African Playwright Who Dissected Apartheid, Dies at 92 - 18 mins ago
-
Russell Henley’s 7-Word Apologetic Message to Collin Morikawa At Arnold Palmer - 36 mins ago
-
New Deal Reached to End Wildcat Strikes by N.Y. Prison Guards - about 1 hour ago
-
Marco Rubio Joins Elon Musk In Polish Minister Smackdown Amid Talk of Feud - about 1 hour ago
-
Romania Bars Ultranationalist Candidate From Presidential Race - 2 hours ago
-
Yankees Ace Gerrit Cole Reportedly Recommended To Have Tommy John Surgery - 2 hours ago
-
Arnold Palmer Invitational 2025: Complete Payout of $20 Million Purse at Bay Hill - 2 hours ago
-
Mark Carney to Be the Next Prime Minister of Canada - 3 hours ago
-
Southern California Hindu temple vandalized with anti-India messages - 3 hours ago
-
Steelers Land DK Metcalf in Massive Blockbuster Trade With Seahawks - 3 hours ago
Plan to truck Eaton fire debris to L.A. park spurs strong backlash
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s plan to open a site to process Eaton fire debris near L.A. County’s foothill communities has prompted swift backlash from local leaders alarmed by the prospect of toxic waste in their backyard.
On Monday, the cities of Duarte, Azusa, Irwindale and Baldwin Park announced their joint opposition to the EPA’s plans to use Lario Park as the destination for hazardous household debris from the fire, including lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. The site is at 15701 E. Foothill Blvd. in an unincorporated area of the county adjacent to the four cities and is slated to begin receiving debris early next week.
Leaders said they were upset about the potential dangers posed to residents as well as the fact that they were not consulted in the decision.
“We are extremely disappointed with the lack of respect to our local residents for not being notified of the EPA’s cleanup efforts and having toxic materials transported to our backyards,” city leaders said in a joint statement.
The EPA designated Lario Park as a processing site on Thursday and has already prepared the site to begin accepting waste, according to federal officials. Measures have been taken to control spills around the areas where debris will be processed, they said.
Once the site is open, debris will be brought in daily, processed into various waste streams, packaged for shipment and sent out to be disposed, according to federal officials.
A similar processing site for Palisades fire debris is planned for a six-acre parcel of land east of Pacific Coast Highway near Topanga Canyon, according to EPA coordinator Tara Fitzgerald.
L.A. County Supervisor Hilda Solis, who represents the foothill communities, said she was deeply concerned by the health and environmental risks that could be posed by the Lario Park site.
“The potential risks associated with hazardous materials, particularly lithium electric vehicle batteries, which are highly flammable and pose environmental contamination risks, are a matter of significant concern,” she said in a statement. “The removal of these materials should not come at the cost of creating a toxic environment for communities already disproportionately impacted by pollution.”
The EPA said it would take steps to ensure safety at the site. Those include air quality monitoring, the use of a water truck to suppress dust and emissions, and continued environmental testing of the site after it closes.
Trucks transporting waste will use back roads by the fire area to access Lario Park and will not travel along the 210 Freeway. Once the material is processed, trucks approved by the state Department of Transportation will be used to transport materials to permanent disposal facilities.
The four foothill cities are working with the office of California state Sen. Susan Rubio (D-Baldwin Park) to host a town hall in Duarte where residents can voice their concerns.
Solis said she visited Lario Park on Monday morning with Rep. Gil Cisneros (D-Covina) and local leaders to raise “critical questions” with EPA representatives.
“As we continue to learn more about the operations’ plans,” she said, “I urge our federal agencies to keep constituents well-informed and mitigate these impacts on our communities.”
The parcel of land is owned by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which alongside the EPA is responsible for its day-to-day operations.
City News Service and Times staff writer Dakota Smith contributed to this report.
Source link