The Tension Between Trump, Israel and Iran — Last Week in Your Words

We’re back with another look at the standout comments you shared over the past week. One story dominated the headlines: President Donald Trump and the conflict between Israel and Iran.

The topic sparked fierce debate and fueled a wide range of opinions and discussions. Once again, Newsweek is proud to highlight your voices. Your comments continue to add depth to the conversation—offering insight, challenge, and thoughtful reflection.

Here are some of your highlighted comments:

On Elon Musk’s Controversial Comments About Manned Aircraft

Original Article: B-2 Strikes on Iran Expose Limits of Elon Musk’s ‘Drone Swarms’

Background: The strike, using B-2 Spirit bombers, reaffirmed the value of manned stealth aircraft at a time when some of the biggest Silicon Valley voices are calling them obsolete relics.

Original Comment: “Did anyone believe Musk when he said that manned military aircraft are obsolete? As successful as he’s been, he doesn’t seem to grasp that government isn’t a business, and everything isn’t about the bottom line.” – Jeffjeffries43

What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter taps into skepticism surrounding Elon Musk’s views on military strategy and challenges his vision of an unmanned future. They cut to the core of the debate: are tech moguls overreaching into areas they don’t fully understand?

On Iran and Their Response to Trump’s Strikes on Nuclear Sites

Original Article: Iran Admits Heavy Nuclear Damage as Israel Backs Trump

Background: President Trump had said the strike resulted in “total obliteration” of the Fordow facility, which is deep underground inside a mountain.

Original Comment: “Would anyone expect Iran to say anything else- especially if they actually still have nuclear capability in the near future?” – jimmy_mcgill

What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter raised questions about the credibility of Iran’s official statements following the strike. They suggest that, especially if Iran still retains nuclear capabilities, it would be expected to downplay or deny the extent of damage.

Continuing the Discussion in the Same Article

Original Comment: “So basically Iran agrees with US/Israel claims, then proceeds to arrest hundreds of possible spies and goes quiet, no talks, no deal and just agrees…sure we’ve stopped them for say a year but…

Now we’re back to where we started as diplomacy was the only way to get insight into their future plans. That’s DOA at this point.” – bigcheezer

What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter highlighted the potential fallout from the strikes, particularly their impact on diplomatic efforts and intelligence gathering. Their perspective echoed a widespread concern shared by many readers.

Original Article: Trump Bombed Iranian Nuclear Sites—Was It a Good Idea? Newsweek Contributors Debate

Background: Newsweek contributors debate whether the strikes a good idea and whether the United States should seek regime change in Tehran.

Original Comment: “Donald Trump’s Approval Rating Plunges in Multiple Polls. Apparently most Americans don’t think it was a good idea.” – Reality

What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter connects public opinion data to the broader debate, implying that military action may be politically unpopular. It adds a real-world consequence to the theoretical discussion over the strikes.

On Pete Hegseth’s Remarks and Questions of Leadership

Original Article: Pete Hegseth Trashing Former Fox News Colleague Sparks Fury from Critics

Background: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly criticized his former colleague Jennifer Griffin during a press briefing, taking issue with her reporting and line of questioning on the administration’s recent strikes against Iran.

Original Comment: “Hegseth calling someone else “about the worst”. Seriously? The US has never had a defense secretary with so little experience, either with the military or with a massive budget.

What does it take for someone like this to genuinely feel embarrassment?” – ninetynine

What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter expresses sharp criticism of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s public remarks, highlighting widespread skepticism about his qualifications and experience. Their comment reflects broader concerns about leadership credibility during a tense geopolitical moment.

Thank you for continuing to engage in the discussions and debates that shape our world. Your voices are being heard—and they will continue to be shared. Stay tuned for more highlighted comments in the weeks to come.