-
3 Dogs Left Alone in Living Room—Owner Films What She Comes Home To - 24 mins ago
-
Volkswagen, Hit by Tariffs, Reports $1.5 Billion Loss and Warns of Chip Shortage - 27 mins ago
-
Southern California teacher arrested on suspicion of sexually abusing multiple children, officials say - 40 mins ago
-
Half of Americans Don’t Know This Common Habit Increases Cancer Risk - 59 mins ago
-
From Gaza to New York’s Mayoral Race, Jewish Identity Splits Over Israel’s Future - about 1 hour ago
-
Can $750 a month help people exit homelessness? - about 1 hour ago
-
Republican Rebellion Over Trump’s Argentina Beef Imports Grows - 2 hours ago
-
Wilders’s Far-Right Party Faces Rebuke in the Netherlands - 2 hours ago
-
What makes a rebellion? Trump troop deployment may hinge on definition - 2 hours ago
-
Jenson Button Confirms Reason For Racing Retirement Ahead Of WEC Finale - 2 hours ago
Trump Admin Warns Releasing SNAP Funds Would Be ‘Disastrous’
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has defended its decision not to use a contingency fund for November’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which is facing disruption due to the federal government shutdown, warning that using the reserve “would be both legally dubious and practically disastrous.”
Dozens of states are suing the department, which oversees SNAP food stamps, demanding the estimated $5 to $6 billion contingency fund be used when funds run dry in November. More than 40 million Americans use SNAP to pay for groceries.
In a court filing on Wednesday, the department argued the money is needed for emergencies, such as natural disasters, and concluded, “wiping out the long-term emergency fund, or depleting the Child Nutrition Programs, would be both legally dubious and practically disastrous. The limited irreparable harm to the States themselves cannot support emergency sweeping relief, and any such order would lead to a chaotic, and still insufficient, disbursement of SNAP benefits.”

The government estimated SNAP requires $9.2 billion in November, though other estimates put the figure at about $8 billion, monthly, far exceeding the reserve.
In the filing, the government said releasing funds that would not cover the full amount is unprecedented and would cause widespread issues.
“Any attempt to calculate and implement a nationwide reduction would long delay this round of benefits, any round of benefits restoring beneficiaries to the full amount for November, and a future round of benefits returning to the standard calculation,” it said.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and other states are seeking an injunction.
This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Source link








