Trump’s Financial Squeeze – The New York Times

Donald Trump has 10 days to come up with a $175 million bond in his New York civil fraud case. After that, he may be on the hook for the full penalty in the case: almost half a billion dollars.

Could this situation affect his presidential campaign? Yes, it could. I will explain how in today’s newsletter, by answering four questions from The Morning’s staff.

What are the basic details of this case?

The New York attorney general, Letitia James, sued Trump and the Trump Organization in 2022. She accused them of committing widespread fraud over a decade by inflating the values of properties, at times by as much as $2 billion a year.

The net effect, James said, was essentially that Trump was able to get loans and insurance policies at more favorable rates than he was otherwise entitled to. A judge agreed, and ordered Trump to pay $454 million — equivalent to the total of his ill-gotten gains, plus the interest he would have paid. Trump has insisted that since his lenders weren’t stiffed, there were no victims, and that he considers the judgment corrupt.

Yesterday, an appeals court said that the state would accept a far smaller bond — $175 million — while it considers whether to uphold the judge’s findings.

Trump tried, but failed, to come up with the $454 million bond before the appeals court stepped in on Monday. Does it seem likely that he will be able to get the smaller bond?

Trump told reporters on Monday in Manhattan that he would be able to post the bond. There’s no independent way to verify that he has enough cash, and if he decides to seek an outside company to provide the bond, he will still need to put up a large amount of cash and other investments as collateral to secure it, and in a short amount of time.

However, the amount is less than half what it was previously, so it will almost certainly be easier now. And some legal experts see the appeals court’s decision as evidence that the court may reduce the $454 million judgment set by Justice Arthur F. Engoron.

Trump’s legal problems are serious. So far, though, they don’t seem to have affected his 2024 campaign. He has become the presumptive nominee in a rout. Why might this case be different?

This case goes to the heart of his identity and public image in a way the criminal cases simply do not. The risk of having his bank accounts frozen — or even one of his properties seized — affects him psychologically, and immediately. This is part of why he was so emphatic that the reduced bond requirement was a victory.

Trump was in a different courtroom in New York yesterday, where a judge set an April 15 start date for Trump’s criminal trial on charges that he falsified business records to cover up hush money payments during the 2016 election. Even if he’s convicted in that case, though, it’s unlikely that he would be sent to prison before Election Day. What’s more, the question of how he ran his business, according to James’s telling, is likely to become a political cudgel for President Biden’s allies. For his part, Trump is painting it all as an overreach by his political opposition.

What should people watch for now?

The appeals court is probably going to take several months to consider the fraud ruling and Trump’s penalty, based on what they said Monday. If they uphold the decision, Trump would then have to hand over almost half a billion dollars. If not, he will describe it as a smack-down of an overzealous judge and attorney general.

Trump’s social media company, which runs Truth Social, closed a deal last week to become a publicly traded company, and it’s an open question whether he will try to use his stake from that deal to acquire a bond from another company.

For now, Trump’s reprieve in the civil fraud case is temporary.

Dobbs did not settle the question of abortion in America; it only led to more cases — like the Supreme Court case over medication abortions, Melissa Murray and Kate Shaw write.

Biden and the United States should make longer, healthier lives a national priority, Ashwin Vasan argues.

Here is a column by Paul Krugman on Obamacare.

Plastic: Restaurants are filled with fake flowers. Meet a man who is responsible.

Aging: To live past 100, eat less, says an Italian expert who thinks faux fasting is the key to longevity.

Bias: A Black couple who claimed that their home appraisal was biased because of their race won a settlement — and changes to a company policy.

Health: Uncomfortably bloated after a flight? Here are some tips for relief.

The Great Read: Bill Ackman is a hedge-fund manager who became famous on Twitter. Now he wields even more power.

Lives Lived: Lisa Lane was a two-time U.S. women’s chess champion and the first chess player to appear on the cover of Sports Illustrated. She protested gender inequality in the sport even as many focused more on her looks than on her ability. Lane died at 90.

College basketball: Caitlin Clark and Iowa escaped an upset against West Virginia to advance to the Sweet 16 with a 64-54 victory.

M.L.B.: The Dodgers star Shohei Ohtani denied any knowledge of illegal gambling by his former interpreter. “I’m beyond shocked,” Ohtani said in a news conference.

Not viral: The Last Dinner Party is trying to become famous the old-fashioned way. The band has rapidly built a following by touring and staging meticulously planned theatrical live shows. They have ignored the temptation to chase fame online.

The group has “become Britain’s buzziest new band,” Alex Marshall writes. They are playing a show in New York today.

Source link