-
Chuck Scarborough to Step Down as WNBC News Anchor After 50-Year Career - 21 mins ago
-
‘Wordle’ Today #1,252 Answer, Hints and Clues for Friday, November 22 - 38 mins ago
-
The UK Faces a Dilemma: Cozy Up to Trump or Reconnect With Europe? - about 1 hour ago
-
NYT ‘Connections’ November 22: Clues and Answers for Game #530 - about 1 hour ago
-
Bob Casey Concedes to David McCormick in Pennsylvania Senate Race - 2 hours ago
-
Police in New Jersey’s Capital Violate Residents’ Rights, U.S. Finds - 2 hours ago
-
Steelers WR Van Jefferson Questionable to Return With Significant Leg Injury - 2 hours ago
-
Pam Bondi Is Trump’s New Choice as Attorney General. Here’s What to Know About Her. - 3 hours ago
-
Newsom touts his economic plans in California’s conservative regions - 3 hours ago
-
Trump Won’t Care that RFK Jr. Compared Him to Hitler, Ex-Aide Says - 3 hours ago
Voters approve Prop. 3, reaffirming gay marriage in California
The California Constitution will no longer include outdated language that defines only marriages between a man and a woman as valid, after voters approved Proposition 3 on Tuesday.
The measure amends the state Constitution to recognize a “fundamental right to marry, regardless of sex or race.”
The prior definition of marriage dates back to 2008, when voters approved a ban on same-sex marriage with Proposition 8. That has since been overturned in court, and a right to marriage is protected at the federal level while liberal California remains a leader on LGBTQ+ rights.
But supporters of Proposition 3 said that the precaution was necessary, warning of potential rulings from a conservative Supreme Court majority that Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump helped appoint.
After the Supreme Court in 2022 overturned Roe vs. Wade, ending the constitutional right to abortion, longtime conservative Justice Clarence Thomas said in a concurring opinion that the court should also reconsider rulings that rely on similar legal reasoning, such as those that protect same-sex marriage and access to contraception.
LGBTQ+ rights groups such as Equality California said that the state should correctly enshrine the right to marriage in its Constitution as it did with abortion rights after the Dobbs decision. The measure was supported by Gov. Gavin Newsom.
It was opposed by the California Family Council, which cited religious reasons and argued it would “harm families and society.”
California is home to the nation’s largest LGBTQ+ population.
Source link